Talk:Naked Boys Singing!
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Klbrain in topic Requested move 5 July 2019
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Naked Boys Singing! article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Naked Boys Singing! (film) page were merged into Naked Boys Singing! on 13 August 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Requested move 6 August 2017 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved DrStrauss talk 21:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Naked Boys Singing! (musical) → Naked Boys Singing! – Suitable title. Kanghuitari (talk) 07:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 08:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Naked Boys Singing! (film) also has an article In ictu oculi (talk) 19:38, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in a WP:TWODABS situation. The musical receives 89.2% of the page views,[1] and the film appears to be of rather marginal notability outside being an adaptation of the musical.--Cúchullain t/c 14:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support per Cuchullain. No such user (talk) 11:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support. The musical is primary boh by significance and by likelihood of being a search term. Andrewa (talk) 09:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 5 July 2019 edit
There is so little content in the film article and none of it interdependently sourced. It would be easily accommodated in the parent article. Without better sources the film article is at risk of deletion and it would be better to conserve content in a broader based article. Velella Velella Talk 11:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
