Talk:Naji Marshall/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Going to review this article. MWright96 (talk) 10:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit

High school career

edit

College career

edit

References

edit

Overall the main issues with the article are portions of the prose that are informal and some that is lacking in specific detail. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 11:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply