Good articleNadodi Mannan has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2017Good article nomineeListed
March 19, 2018Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

Requested move 13 June 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Hatnote is in place and Nadodi Mannan (disambiguation) is marked PROD. (closed by non-admin page mover)Guanaco 06:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


Nadodi Mannan (1958 film)Nadodi Mannan – On the basis of cultural significance, readership and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Proof of high readership here: [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2016-07-01&end=2017-01-21&pages=Nadodi_Mannan_(1958_film) Kailash29792 (talk) 17:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nadodi Mannan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pavanjandhyala (talk · contribs) 14:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


Will start tomorrow. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lead
  • If we notice the lead's plot summary, there are no names mentioned. That is fine but why not use the English equivalent of Rajguru instead of Rajguru?
  • Anaga Anaga oka Raju? Agreed you don't know Telugu. But breaking Anaganaga into Anaga Anaga is a shabdha dosham. Please correct it.
Plot
  • "However, the kingdom's Rajaguru (high priest) Vijayavarman, plans to kill Marthandan and make Pingalan king." -- Who is Pingalan? How is he related to Marthandan?
  • "On entering a pub in Ratnapuri, Veerangan and Sagayam beat up a gang of rowdies": Pub? Really? I never knew that Tamil films were this advanced. Talk about progressiveness. ;-) BTW, is rowdies the right word?
@Pavanjandhyala: Yes. It is a hotel actually, changed now. Rowdies is the right word as the word Goons are not much known to readers who aren't subcontinental.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • "Veerangan tells him of the pathetic state the people of Rantapuri, and Marthandan agrees to set everything right as soon as he takes charge." -- It is Ratnapuri.
  • Who saved Marthandan from dying?
  • "The duo then free Marthandan and Karmegam, who had been captured by Vijayavarman, who is now reformed." -- Avoid the repetition of "who".
  • "Veerangan marries Ratna, and Marthandan issues a proclamation stating Ratnapuri is a democracy." -- "...stating that Ratnapuri..."
Cast
  • Is it necessary to capitalise K in King of Kanni Theevu?
  • Why Queen Manohari? Marthandan was referred to as Marthandan only, right?
Production
  • "Ramachandran accepted that at the time they were both confused over what to do next." -- do you mean "at that time"?
  • "As director, Ramachandran was keen to obtain the results he wanted and repeatedly shot retakes of the same scene until he felt it was perfect." -- Can't this be made simple. Like say "Ramachandran wanted the end result to be perfect and shot multiple retakes for the same scene."
  • The rest of this section is fine.
Music
  • "The song "Varunga Varunga Vendhe" was composed in Kannada with lyrics by Vijaya Narasimha, in Malayalam with lyrics by P. Bhaskaran, and in Telugu with lyrics by Narayanababuas, well as in Tamil." -- The latter half of the sentence needs better phrasing.
Box office
  • Again Anaga Anaga Oka Raju...
  • Why is Madurai not linked?

Rest is fine. Nothing much to complain.

Conclusion: I find this one of Ramachandran's most politically aware films till date. Good work on the article, mostly inspiring at parts. Let me know once the concerns are met. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:42, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Pavanjandhyala: The rest of your comments have been resolved.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ssven2, I put a hidden note in the "casting" section, containing a ref you could use. Pavan, once he adds it, can you please review it? Kailash29792 (talk) 09:13, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Kailash29792 and Ssven2: Okay. Let me know when it is added. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Kailash29792 and Pavanjandhyala: Added as a footnote.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:04, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:   Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Pavanjandhyala: Thank you for the review, Pavan.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 17:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:21, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply