This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
user:SarekOfVulcan beat me to the edit. Daily Mail ref thinks she's notable, and they're always right. Her morality (and belly dancing past) has also been used as an attack on Murray's own credibility. Unjust, but noteworthy. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I would still dispute that she is notable: one article in a tabloid newspaper is not in my view "significant coverage" as defined by Wikipedia:Notability. In addition, her past being used to attack Murray's credibility is really an argument for a section on her in his article, not her own one. --Jackyd101 (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
