Talk:NORTHAG wartime structure in 1989
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NORTHAG wartime structure in 1989. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224154346/http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/default.aspx to http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/default.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NORTHAG wartime structure in 1989. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150214052454/http://www.defenceviewpoints.co.uk/articles-and-analysis/france-s-changing-role-in-nato to http://www.defenceviewpoints.co.uk/articles-and-analysis/france-s-changing-role-in-nato
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Removal of vehicle numbers edit
Someone here has valiantly attempted and listed for some years the guesses at Table of Organisation and Equipment totals of vehicles in the manoeuvre, aviation, and artillery battalions for some years. Such information creates false impressions if listed in this way. It implies that somehow someone *knew* that *every* unit listed had its *full* number of vehicles theoretically assigned, actually present, on every day of 1989. This strains reality considerably!! TOE strengths of manoeuvre battalions in the late 1980s are a fully valid subject of study, but should not be presented in this fashion. The only listings that should be here for vehicle numbers are when there's a *specific* report that such-and-such a battalion has such-and-such number of vehicles present, and that should be referenced to a specific report, indicating a specific date of that report!! Thus I am in the process of removing all the numbers. I would greatly welcome editors writing long articles on the TOEs of the British, German, Belgian, U.S. and Royal Netherlands Army in the late 1980s. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
3rd Panzer Division edit
Hi all, I'm in the midst of doing a mapping project where I show all the NATO units present in 1989, and I'm seeing an inconsistency between this page and historical information.
This order of battle seems to indicate that the West German 3rd Panzer Division is under the command of the I Dutch Corps in the immediate north of West Germany, in Lower Saxony. However, I have proof from both English-language and German-language sources that indicates that the 3rd Panzer Division was under the command of I German Corps as it should have been.
I would appreciate a more experienced editor than myself changing the location of 3rd PzDiv from under the Dutch Corps to under the German Corps. Thanks. JoeSolo22 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- 3rd Panzer Division was under I German Corps during peacetime, but would have come under I Dutch Corps during war to screen the march of the Dutch divisions, which were (except for one brigade) based in the Netherlands. Once the three Dutch divisions would have arrived, whatever remained of 3rd Panzer would have, depending on the situation, either returned to I German Corps or remained with I Dutch Corps. As the article is about the wartime structure of NORTHAG the placing of 3rd Panzer is correct. noclador (talk) 18:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)