This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I don't have the time right now to upload but if anyone's interested there are in fact
CC BY 2.0 versions of the development CGIs that have been released by The Co-operative on Flickr, [1]. ChiZeroOne (talk) 14:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think, considering it's height, architecture and importance (as a head office of a large company), it rightly deserves its own page. I'm a little tentative about creating one until the building is opened next year. Stevo1000 (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2011 (UTC)Reply