Talk:NK Zagreb

Latest comment: 2 years ago by PeaceDefender in topic PNIŠK misconception
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NK Zagreb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

PNIŠK misconception

edit

I just added title PNIŠK misconception to article in section History.

It is due to wrong information about foundation of the club, which roots lies in the 90s, short story, in newly formed state of Croatia, it was not desirable to have connections with the communist or non-Croatian heritage, both in politics, life and in sports, so many clubs, as well as football, rediscovered their "true" roots, in the sense - the older the better. This is also the case with Zagreb - PNIŠK, which have no connection with each other except the name Zagreb. PNIŠK, with the football section formed in 1903, very soon ceased to operate in 1909. But myth was accepted as general knowledge.

I am interested in what the next step is, deleting that segment, how, what with the written text that does not have its own page in English (there is a page in Croatian), how to prove the claim, what are the rules, etc.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeaceDefender (talkcontribs) 19:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply