Talk:NGC 66

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Reference Reliability

edit

I noticed that two of the "sources" are Wikipedia articles. I'm fairly certain that wikipedia is kind of like the dictionary definition of a word, in that wikipedia doesn't cite itself as a source in one of its articles, much like a good dictionary doesn't use a word in its definition. There are a few outside sources that weren't used that I added to the infobox that could be used, but before I change anything, I just want to make sure that wikipedia citing itself is actually okay 5donuts (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Presentation of Information

edit

I noticed that some of the information listed in the infobox is also given in the snippet of information, and seems somewhat repetitive, as it was just the apparent magnitude, RA, and Dec 5donuts (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

One other thing, I can't find anything about the catalogue abbreviated AM, does anyone know what this stands for?5donuts (talk) 17:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to know so that I can make a wikilink to the appropriate article5donuts (talk) 17:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NGC 66. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply