 | A fact from NGC 3393 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the spiral galaxy NGC 3393 hosts the nearest known pair of supermassive black holes? Source: [1] "At a distance of 160 million light years, NGC 3393 contains the nearest known pair of supermassive black holes. " [2]
- ALT1:... that NGC 3393 was the first spiral galaxy found to host a pair of supermassive black holes? Source: [3] "At a distance of 160 million light years, NGC 3393 contains the nearest known pair of supermassive black holes. " [4]
Created by C messier (talk). Self-nominated at 22:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC).
- Nice article! I prefer the original hook as it is more compelling. this review is for that one. I se you only have 2 other articles that have mad eit through DYK so no QPQ needed yet.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article:
- n - Clear at 100px: - n
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
all good except for the image. It is not used in the article and is not very compleeling at a low resolution due to the image in image. Everything else is good to go! Found5dollar (talk) 21:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Found5dollar, I have removed the image from the nomination, since it cannot be used for the reasons you've noted. Can you please continue your review now that the image is gone? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset, The hook still says "Pictured" even though there is no image now. if we get rid of that. I'm ready to give this a checkmark.Found5dollar (talk) 17:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Found5dollar, the uses of "(pictured)" are gone. When you give the approval tick, be sure to specify which (or both) hook(s) you're approving. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
the original hook is good to go!Found5dollar (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
