Talk:NFC West

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Littlebum2002 in topic Merger proposal

1982 championships

edit

Because of the strike the NFL did not have the division set up at the end of the season. I don't think or any team in the NFC E/W and old central or AFC E/W and old central should be listed asthe 1982 champions. I think the table should be blank for 1982 with the team with best record listed in the footnote. It should not be writtent to reflect the team as the champion of the division for that season Smith03 22:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Okay, those state WikiProject templates are getting out of hand

edit

I don't see how Wikiproject California and Wikiproject North Carolina could help us maintain NFL-related articles. I can understand tagging the San Quentin State Prison article for Wikiproject California but not the NFC West just because only one California team is in this division. Those bots are getting out of hand. This article and other ones probably should part of the Wikiproject NFL only. --J. Nguyen 00:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Trivia Section

edit

Do we really need the trivia section? The information abou the Seahawks is already incorporated into other places of the article. --Mjrmtg 19:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

I think this is a no-brainer, considering that the other NFL divisions from 1967 redirect to their current incarnations and makes mention to the 1967 divisions. (NFL Capitol:NFC East, NFL Century:AFC North, NFL Central:NFC North) Ditto with the NFC & AFC Central monikers being redirected to the current Northern equivalent. But, I do want to suggest this in case people start an editing war on here. Jgera5 (talk) 07:21, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

-I agree. I think this can go ahead and start, it doesn't look like anyone opposes it. I don't see why they would. littlebum2002 14:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply