Talk:NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund was copied or moved into Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Untitled
editMost, but not all, of the information I am adding to this page comes from http://www.naacpldf.org. I have tried to stay within fair use, and have written the LDF asking for explicit permission to use this material. Since the sections of the site I am using are specifically intended for the press, I would presume that use of this material is actively welcome. -- Jmabel 19:27, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)
- I contacted Kay Shaw (kshaw@NAACPLDF.ORG) about this. She wrote back, (September 29, 2004 07:38 am): "I have forwarded your request to management for review. I included a strong recommendation that they approve use of the text... Also, we would like to include a credit that is something to the effect: Portions of this page is used with the permission of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. and a copyright symbol." I haven't received anything more formal, but I think we can consider that clear lack of objection. I'm going to paraphrase Kay's wording slightly, because the grammar is wrong ("portions...is") and add it to the article. -- Jmabel | Talk 18:05, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)
The article states that LDF Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg "ended 'all deliberate speed' in desegregation." Greenberg was involved in numerous cases such as Brown v. Board of Education which mandated that desegregation be effected with "all deliberate speed." While Greenberg was unhappy with the phrasing of the court's decision in Brown, neither he nor anybody else has eliminated the concept of "all deliberate speed" at least not so far as I am aware.
```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wicked Pedagogue (talk • contribs) 10:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Cases litigated by NAACP/LDF
editMaybe a category should be created: Cases litigated by NAACP, that is provided on the specific articles that deal with the cases. They have been so important in gaining civil rights. There is such a category for those litigated by the ACLU.--Parkwells (talk) 00:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090515203226/http://www.tourolaw.edu/about/distinguished_visitors/public_interest_lawyer_in_residence/1997-elaine%20jones.asp to http://www.tourolaw.edu/about/distinguished_visitors/public_interest_lawyer_in_residence/1997-elaine%20jones.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100728034242/http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Theodore_Shaw to http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Theodore_Shaw
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
balance
editOne would never know from the chronological list that they ever had any failures. Nor is there any discussion about internal differences about strategy. DGG ( talk ) 18:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Acs Harassing the minority
editWhat more can parents do when the system keep failing us!! We keep being told Acs are here to protect and guide and help us young people today I can say those are lies. I come here today because Acs has took my life and they also been harassing me and my children. I’m single mom of eight kids I’m 28 year old I do every and anything I can do for my kids Acs has never try to help me!! Most Acs did was kept trying paint me as this horrible mother and take my kids November 19 2021 Acs came into my bx new year project and without proper investigation they removed my children please I need help I have no one help me or advocating for my children or me!! Any one can help please my email is marioncrawford1993@gmail.com 68.194.225.35 (talk) 20:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Can we delete this please? It is not relevant to this article at all. Scotty1141 (talk) 03:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Reference #19 is not correct
editThe reference regarding Gardendale is not correct, the article speaks to Texas voter ID laws instead. Scotty1141 (talk) 03:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)