Talk:Mythodea

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified
Good articleMythodea has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 12, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 14, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA on hold

edit
  • it was picked in 2001 by Vangelis' new 'picked in'?
  • References come after punctuation with no space [1]. should be .[1]
  • Vangelis not only composed the music, he also wrote the lyrics[4] in Ancient Greek. Naturally in English it sounds as meaningless words. Remove the meaningless part its stupid
  • Don't start a section with a quote.
  • Remove, merge or expand the one sentence paragraphs
  • Remove the white space between sections
  • Would be better if you remove the sales chart and convert it into a paragraph
  • 'Miscellanea' is basically a trivia section. Remove or incorporate it into the body as trivia sections are frowned upon.
  • Video section is very stubby and should be merged with the rest.
  • Not GA requirement but alphabetize the categories
  • Image:Mythodea dvd.jpg Needs fair use rationale - The image caption is also wayyyy tooo long.
  • References are a problem. They do not contain things like Publisher, date, author date last accessed. The {{cite web}} template can help with this, examples can be found here
  • Album track listing - should be just tracklisting as its a subsection to Album.
  • References needed here
    • although this was acknowledged as a mistake by the record company and was corrected.
    • The DVD reached gold status for sales in Portugal. - Could also be reworded The DVD attained gold status selling x copies in Portugal

Once these issues are dealt with I'll have another look, if these are done it will be close to GA. I have this watch listed so respond here. M3tal H3ad 08:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I completed the remaining work started by user:Alex valavanis. I also took the opportunity to shuffle the structure of the article in order to tighten it, bringing the two concerts together and also bringing the two media (album and video) together. The sections were previously in chronological order but I (who had written the bulk of the text and structured the article) had never been happy with it. I also moved the album infobox from the top to the album subsection, as this is not an article about the album, and put the DVD image at the top. However, I don't know if an infobox must be up there. Finally, if I changed too much in the middle of a GA assessment, I apologise. --maf 03:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Looks a lot better. Only problem now is one sentence paragraphs and the references. The references are missing publishers (the website its from. M3tal H3ad 04:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
How's it looking now? - Alex valavanis 20:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Pass. M3tal H3ad 06:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Mythodea album cover.jpg

edit
 

Image:Mythodea album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)   Done Papa November (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

not an oratorio, but a choral symphony

edit

I have removed references to Mythodea being an oratorio. It is a choral symphony. I had introduced the concept of the oratorio based on this source, but the newer choral symphony article settles the matter. --maf (talk-cont) 01:33, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mythodea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply