Talk:My Grandfather Would Have Shot Me

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Research17 in topic Minor point re opening paragraph

File:Jennifer Teege - My Grandfather (2015).jpg

edit

File:Jennifer Teege - My Grandfather (2015).jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has been nominated for deletion -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 06:08, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 30 September 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved, unopposed. Please make sure the article gets restructured to reflect the move. Jenks24 (talk) 08:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply



Jennifer TeegeMy Grandfather Would Have Shot Me – per AfD opening a discussion. This article, as it is currently written, is a book article, with little content outside what is needed to cover the book. Therefore, it should be renamed to be about the book. The two topics have been deemed notable, but the article right now is about the book. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 03:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

This really strikes me as a move which was pushed through rapidly to avoid any challenges and is also against the consensus of the AfD. The article really should be moved back to its original title. -O.R.Comms 15:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Rapidly"? The discussion was open for two weeks. Jenks24 (talk) 16:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I misread the dates and thought it was open for only three days. Still, seems to go against the AfD in spirit at least. -O.R.Comms 17:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Changes resulting from re-title

edit

I have rewritten the lead para, and changed the categories to be appropriate for the book rather than the person. I have also added DISPLAYTITLE to show the title in italic; that can be removed if "Infobox writer" is replaced by "Infobox book" (which should be done) as that infobox italicises the title automatically. JohnCD (talk) 20:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Poeticbent talk 23:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Minor point re opening paragraph

edit

Just a minor point about the opening paragraph. Should this be "famously" or "infamously"? Yes I know it is the person rather than the depiction which is infamous, although the word famously still sits a little uncomfortably with me. Research17 (talk) 03:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply