Talk:My Bloody Valentine (film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
moved a paragraph heavy with spoilers to below the spoiler disclaimer. 88.157.200.40 02:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Forgot to cite my change: Running time for uncut version was incorrectly cited at 101 minutes, when the uncut film is actually 93 minutes. -anon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.72.79 (talk) 09:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:My bloody valentineposter.jpg edit
Image:My bloody valentineposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Lack of Citation edit
This article lacks a significant amount of citations for its information and many of the article's sections are unsourced. These unsourced material should be fixed and citations added to the information in the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Youngsters? edit
The plot summary repeatedly used the word "youngster." That's a pretty ambiguous term that can be used for everything from toddlers to teenagers. Maybe someone who has seen the film can replace the term with something that actually connotes meaning? Wickedjacob (talk) 03:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)