Talk:My Big Fat Greek Rush Week/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 18:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

I'll put up the comments shortly! NumerounovedantTalk 18:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Lead

• At the time of its initial broadcast, the episode was watched by ... people/ In its initial airing
• "My Big Fat Greek Rush Week" featured - "The episode featired"

Plot

• The opening sentence seems odd "talks about her rape"?
• "heard Parker having sex, and Parker blames her." - blames her for what? having sex?her rape? it is awkwardly written
• "Keith (Enrico Colantoni) hikes through the desert." - How does that fit in here?
• "Wallace’s (Percy Daggs III) and Logan's (Jason Dohring) sociology professor recruits volunteers for a Stanford prison experiment-like study."

"Cormac (Jason Beghe) starts following Keith." - I am really lost here. How does any of that make sense?

The same problem continues throughout the section. Too many short sentences that barely connect to each other. I suggest you re-structure the whole thing, because honestly in its current state none of it seems to be making any sense. NumerounovedantTalk 19:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The section is much more comprehensive now. Still some minor blips: Towards the end seperate the conclusion with some the like "The episode ends with..." and who's Mac? NumerounovedantTalk 17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Production

• "Levine had previously worked with star Chris Lowell on the recently cancelled Life as We Know It" - recently? it's awkwardly written plus recently further complicates the sentence. Recent to the episode airing? or now?

Ratings

• Same as Lead

Is there nothing more to the section? Maybe if you add the viewrship rankings and/or Nielsen Ratings it becomes more comprehensive. You may also compare the ratings to that of the previous episode and show the trend in viewrship throught that. NumerounovedantTalk 17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Reception

• Will add comments shortly.

"indicating that it was "great""- does the score indicates that it was great?(if so remove the quotes) or did he say so?(if so rephrase)

• It's included as part of the score. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

• "very positive" - "postitive"/"lauded the episode"
• Rowan Kaiser, writing for - remove the comma NumerounovedantTalk 17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

References

Publishers missing in refs 3, 6 & 10

• That's bizarre. I don't usually make that mistake. Fixed. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

These minor issues are sometimes overlooked! That's perfectly fine. NumerounovedantTalk 06:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

NumerounovedantTalk 13:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

• @Numerounovedant: I have responded to all your comments so far. I am looking forward to hearing your remaining comments on the article! :) Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 15:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

• @Johanna: Great work that you are putting into on all the articles relating the topic. just the few queries and I'll be happy to go through with the nomination. NumerounovedantTalk 17:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

• @Numerounovedant: I have responded to the rest of your comments. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Final Comments

@Johanna: All my queries were addressed. Well done! NumerounovedantTalk 06:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: