Talk:Mut'ah of Hajj

Hadith as sources

Hadith are very tenuous sources. They are good to reference for more context in rulings, but interpretation of hadith is for noted scholars... therefore I think it's of the utmost importance that you add scholarly references and mention the hadith that scholars refer to. gren グレン 10:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Yes of course, the more sources the better, i will keep an eye open. Do you see anything objectinable? --Striver 00:53, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Unhelpful

This article really does not explain itself at all. Following several links, it seems to be about the prohibition of certain behaviour associated with pilgrimage. But it does not say what was allowed or prohibited by whom when . Links are about providing more information, not the basis of the article. --Henrygb 09:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

understood, ill try to fix it soon. Thanks for the tip. --Striver 18:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

11 years later and the article is still almost incomprehensible. Ashmoo (talk) 08:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Merge

There's another article called Combining Umrah and Hajj which I think could probably be merged into this one, especially since it doesn't have any sources. Anyone else have an opinion? --Elonka 04:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mut'ah of Hajj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050405010046/http://www.islam-pure.de/imam/fatwas/manasik02.htm to http://www.islam-pure.de/imam/fatwas/manasik02.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060830145427/http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/026.sbt.html to http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/026.sbt.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)