Talk:Music of Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review
Good articleMusic of Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starMusic of Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII is part of the Final Fantasy XIII series, a good topic. It is also part of the Music of the Final Fantasy series series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 6, 2014Good article nomineeListed
October 19, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
November 9, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Music of Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


Will leave some initial comments within 48 hours. Thanks, Jaguar 18:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: while @ProtoDrake: wrote this article and nominated it, I've written the majority of the Final Fantasy music articles, including FXIII and Music of XIII-2, so I'll be helping out with the GAN as per his request if he has any trouble addressing your concerns. --PresN 20:15, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I understand, thanks for telling me. I'll have the review to you by tomorrow morning. Jaguar 21:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Initial comments

edit

Lead

edit
  • The opening sentence of the lead makes it sound like it's talking about the game itself, I looked at Music of Final Fantasy XIV as an example and saw that it opened with "The music for the MMORPG Final Fantasy XIV was composed by Nobuo Uematsu..." Why the change?
  • "the main soundtrack was performed and recorded in Boston by the Video Game Orchestra, headed by Shota Nakama" - would you prefer the use of conducted? That's if he did conduct it...
  • The lead summarises the article well, so this meets the GA criteria

Concept and creation

edit
  • "Because of the game's day-night cycle," - would read better as Due to the game's day-night cycle
  • "The game also featured multiple musical Easter eggs" - it would be best to link Easter eggs, assuming that some readers wouldn't know what it means in gaming

Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII Original Soundtrack

edit
  • "the third covers Yusnaan and important themes" - is Yusnaan a location?
  • "It was released by Square Enix under the catalog number SQEX-10392~5" - I notice that this is mentioned in the other section too. Is mentioning the catalogue numbers really notable?

Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII Original Soundtrack Plus

edit
  • Any album art? (won't affect GAN)
  • "featuring unreleased tracks and rearrangements of classic themes used in the game" - how so? Aren't they remixes?
  • "RPGFan's Neal Chandran was mostly negative about the album" - regarding

References

edit

On hold

edit

Along with the thousands of other Final Fantasy music GAs, this one shouldn't be hard to pass. The only things currently standing in the way of this one becoming GA are what I mentioned above and those minor copyediting issues. However if they can all be addressed then this one should see no difficulty in passing the GAN. By the way, the album art won't affect the GAN! I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days. Jaguar 15:13, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

All dealt with, apart from the catalog numbers, which are present in the other Final Fantasy music articles and seem to be something that's accepted in this kind of article. --ProtoDrake (talk) 15:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Close - promoted

edit

As it currently stands the article definitely meets the GA criteria. It is broad, well written and all the references check out, overall a compact article. There's nothing much else to add! Well done on the extra work, this looks like another Final Fantasy music GA! Jaguar 17:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply