Talk:Musha Incident

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled edit

I think the article is bit spinned toward Chinese POV. I will try to do bit better. FWBOarticle 22:40, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Cleaned up the text a bit so it's far less engrish. Probably left a few spelling errors, but hopefully the grammar is more coherent. Chronarion 22:35, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Further cleaned up the spelling. May have to wikify the article.--Euniana 22:48, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:A040.jpg edit

 

Image:A040.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wushe Incident? edit

I don't think Wushe is a good tile. Becuase it's Madarin Chinese, people that time speak Japanese and Taiwanese mainly, never Madarin. I suggest that Japanese Musha would be better.

  • Tough shit, because Wushe is the name used by English speakers, and this is the English Wikipedia. Musha is pretty much never used, and to use it as the title for this would just confuse things. Plus the vast majority of Taiwan speaks Mandarin, for good or for ill.--61.224.41.247 (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Braves"? edit

The article says "Shortly before dawn, Mona Rudao led over 300 Seediq braves in the raiding of strategic police sub-stations to capture weapons and ammunition. They then moved on the elementary school, concentrating their attack on the Japanese in attendance. 134 Japanese, including women and children, were killed in the attack. Two Taiwanese were also mistakenly killed, one of whom was a girl wearing a Japanese kimono." The use of the word "braves" for the people who attacked the athletic event seems a bit strange and biased. How brave is it to attack a school? Perhaps it would be more neutral to call them "warriors". Readin (talk) 14:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The term "brave(s)" is used as a synonym for "warriors" in English speaking countries, particularly the US. But if you want to change it, go right ahead. It makes no differnce to me.--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 06:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Musha incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply