Talk:Museum of Science Fiction/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
COI
believe the COI tag should stay as an unpaid volunteer can still have a COI. While the museum is notable, there are some advertorial issues here as well. StarM 01:31, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Could you explain some more, are there resources to read, how many people need to edit before there is no longer a COI? What are the advertorial issues? Please be specific, we're new to the workings of Wikipedia. Iollannmac (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Museum of Science Fiction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140720203341/http://dcist.com/2014/07/photos_museum_of_science_fiction_ge.php to http://dcist.com/2014/07/photos_museum_of_science_fiction_ge.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140720203341/http://dcist.com/2014/07/photos_museum_of_science_fiction_ge.php to http://dcist.com/2014/07/photos_museum_of_science_fiction_ge.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)