Talk:Murder of Mary Stachowicz

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 2804:6A00:F017:2200:19:5ACC:C622:658A in topic Neutrality

Neutrality

edit

This article could really do with being more neutral. In particular, the sources used are all very one-sided and some more mainstream news sources would be a big improvement. Looking at google and google news, I'm having trouble finding any. --BelovedFreak 21:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok, it's better now. --BelovedFreak 00:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
this article is a joke, i literally have to remove the guilt-by-assosiation fallacy with conservatives/right-wingers on the article, Wikipedia has become a joke, "oh you think this is a hate-crime? guess what? some conservatives somewhere also do, so that makes the view of her murder as a hate-crime a right-wing view therefore is not valid". and they still think is website is not left-leaning or anti-christian, and before you ask, i'm apolitical, not a conservative. 2804:6A00:F017:2200:19:5ACC:C622:658A (talk) 20:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The fact is that the guy killed Mary because she disapproved of his homosexual lifestyle and urged him to change. You might not agree with that, but hey free speech right? Not when it comes to gays apparently. He killed her. And then someone made very sure that there was no real mention of why she died in this article. Any attempts to state the facts are immediately deleted. Shades of 1984. But we do remember her and we remember that she was a victim of a hate crime perpetrated by a homosexual because of her Catholic faith. May she rest in peace.70.108.117.53 (talk) 04:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since the crime was never prosecuted as a hate crime, it would seem to me that adding such information would be injecting personal belief. I'm sure the prosecution felt that the motive for the murder was the taunting, not the fact that she was a Catholic or a woman. Maaron (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I removed POV information yesterday. This is a basic rule of Wikipedia. You need sources for any claims that may be disputed. --Moni3 (talk) 13:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
it's still a hate crime because she was killed for her religious views. the prosecution's beliefs don't mean anything, those are the same people who believe OJ is innocent 2804:6A00:F017:2200:19:5ACC:C622:658A (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mary Stachowicz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply