This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I tagged the Lead section of this article as having extra information that is not included in the body of the article. See MOS:LEAD for what the lead secion should contain and how it should be written. The lead should introduce and summarize an article, not contain details not discussed by the article. While the first sentence should remain, the second sentence talks about the murder rate. Strictly speaking, the rate of people being murdered in Mississippi is outside the scope of an article about the law about murder in Mississippi. Instead it should be discussed in an article about Murder in Mississippi. However, discussing the rate at which the law ia exercised is a valid discussion point, and one that needs more explanation in the article, before including it in the lead section. Otherwise, this raises theexpectations of the reader's of what the article will contain, only for them to be let down when nothing is written about the issue. This is misleading to the reader. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply