Murad Mirzayev is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
The article is wholly a POV as no neutral, non-Azerbaijani reliable sources used. OptimusView (talk) 12:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
What does it mean? Do you have some non-Azerbaijani sources that claim something different that was said in the article? If yes, show them. --Interfase (talk) 12:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
In AA conflict only neutral reliable sources should be used. If there are not such sources then this is a pov pushing about a subject without notability. OptimusView (talk) 12:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
So, where did you see an information based on conflicted source that needs "neutral reliable sources"? If there is no such information and such conflicted source, we don't need another "neutral sources". --Interfase (talk) 13:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
I still didn't see explanation why the sources in the article are non neutral reliable sources. So I will remove the neutrality tag. --Interfase (talk) 10:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
