Talk:Murabitun World Movement

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Moved two last paragraphs from Chiapas article edit

NOTE. I moved the last two paragraphs from the article on the Mexican state of Chiapas. These were taking almost half of the article. This connection and topic are far too removed from, specialized, and irrelevant to the main topics in that state to remain there. I have no relation or information or connection of any kind to the Murabitun topic, and I just thought these lines could belong more properly here. I didn't delete it out of courtesy. My apologies if it doesn't belong here. PLEASE remove it at will. Sergio sanchez, 20 feb. 2006.


I think the Murabitun rulers of Zaragoza are also known as Almoravides. There is a link to Almoravides at the top of the article. The Zaragoza rulers information doesn't belong here. Yodakii 18:02, 26 August 2005 (UTC)Reply


There is no need for the entire text of the article by Abdalhaqq Bewley which is referenced in the article on Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi. Anyway, I reverted the article to the last most coherent version and suspect that the page is much more coherent now.

Assertions of notability edit

The notability of the group is known, but for someone who is new to Islamic movements they may not realize that looking at this article. I think the big reason is that a number of primary sources are used. Per WP:RS, primary sources are acceptable to an extent and I don't think their usage here is controversial, but that being said the article is in need of secondary sources. If those can be brought and incorporated into the article, I think it would allay concerns both about notability and over-reliance on primary sources. MezzoMezzo (talk) 11:09, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Murabitun World Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply