Talk:Multi-tool/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
reflink
What's the dealio with the second reference link? — special:contribs/124.148.244.198 (talk) 15:36, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
some heading
Can someone please helpp me to make a contents menu system at the head of this page like this one: drill thanks, — suds (noob) 06:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- All you have to do is break the article into sections, with the header at the start of each section looking a bit like this (except that it should start at the left-hand margin) Wikipedia automatically creates a table of contents for any article which has (I think) at least 3 sections. P.S. on discussion pages like this one it is considered helpful to sign yourself using 4 tildes '~' which will automatically put in your name and the date and time. — Murray Langton (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
antiquity
There's a remarkably modern-looking Roman multitool on display at the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge. They call it a "Roman Swiss Army knife": slideshow (sorry, Flash) @01:35. — special:contribs/87.162.25.246 (talk) 11:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
zapping the power tools
Well it's clear that while some power tools could be considered a "multi tool", and even call themselves that - it's a radically different concept than the multi-tool this article addresses. So based on Wikipedia:NOTDICTIONARY, if there needs to be reference to them - which I doubt - it should be purely as a disabig - pointing to something like Multi-tool (powertool). — Snori (talk) 13:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)