Talk:Multi-National Corps – Iraq

Article name

Could the person who is suggesting the page move please lay out their reasons? I'm not sure there's any need to move the page, as things stand now. Buckshot06 01:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Seeing that the person has not returned, and that the page move request seems wrong, I've removed it. If someone wants to put it back, please use WP:RM and go through proper procedure. -Patstuart^talk|edits 21:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Multi-National Force - Iraq is an organization. It has an official name of "Multi-National Force - Iraq" not "Multinational Force Iraq". This can be seen on the official website. --Pmsyyz 04:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

The proper name is Multi-National Force - Iraq and not Multinational Force Iraq as the user Pmsyyz noted, if someone wants to be particular about the proper title of the article then it should be changed according to the MNF-I website: http://www.mnf-iraq.com/ On another note, the article is not two separate organizations, they are the same organization, the issue is over the proper title/spelling of the article for Wikipedia. -Signaleer 15:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Problem because this is incorrect use of the hyphen (see: dash). —tilde 05:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Merger

They look like two different article subjects to me. Murderbike 07:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Do Not Merge -- On is about the background of the multinational "Coalition of the willing", the other is the Multi-National Force - Iraq, which is a military name for the unit that replaces CJTF 7 in 2004. MPS 06:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Why not? They're talking about the same subject, it should be merged. -Signaleer 07:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

• Do Not Merge one is about the invasion of Iraq by the Coalition and the other is about the Iraqi new army forces. Nachomanco

Just do you know, this isn't a vote. -Signaleer 06:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, it's a discussion/debate. Hence why they are giving reasons to back up their suggestions, as is done on all debates of this matter, such as at XfD. People are reminded it isn't a vote, if all they put is "Delete", or "Keep", and the like.

Anyway, I have no opinion on this either way, but if it is not merged, then I would like to see it moved to Multi-National Force - Iraq. --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 16:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

They are on the same subject, the multinational peacekeeping/occupying/whatever you want to call it force in Iraq, as the Iraqi Army etc have their own pages. But one page is mostly politics and troop withdrawals, the other being a listing of US army forces. Bit hard to merge. Cheers Buckshot06 05:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

• Removing tag seems people feel rather lukewarm about the idea--Victor falk 20:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Rename to MNC-I?

We currently have two separate pages for the same force, MNF-I, at the moment, with this page focusing on troop rotations. But we have no page for Multi-National Corps - Iraq (MNC-I), the hq immediately under MNF I. This page covers much of the kind of material that might go in that article. What do people think about changing the name of this page to MNC-I, and that might solve the problem and create a place when MNC-I information could go. Thoughts? Buckshot06 15:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Current Iraq commander?

This page says that the commander's post is vacant, but the official website of MNF-Iraq indicates that Gen. Petraeus is still in charge (Petraeus's wiki entry confirms that). Who's right? Mwlin1 (talk) 10:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Multi-National Corps – Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090605090714/http://www.shurakaal-iraq.com/ to http://www.shurakaal-iraq.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060913124141/http://defendamerica.mil/articles/aug2006/a080406dg1.html to http://www.defendamerica.mil/articles/aug2006/a080406dg1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)