Talk:Mulgrave, Victoria

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

The photo edit

The photo of Mulgrave is probably the most unrepresentative image out there (being an empty field). It's important to realise that we're not just looking of a photo of some location in Mulgrave but something that represents the actual area. I would suggest a photo of Waverley Gardens Shopping Centre, which being a shopping centre might create the impression that Mulgrave is primarily a residential suburb. invincible (talk) 14:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Are you in a position to take one and upload it either on en or to Commons? This would be my suggestion if you are located nearby - that way we get the best picture from a local perspective. Which reminds me, I really should upload some of the ones I got on my last Melbourne trip around Chelsea/Edithvale... Orderinchaos 14:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm sort of nearby but it'd be a bit out of my way, since I never really head towards that way apart from the section of Springvale Rd, but then again the office buildings there could be a good illustration too. I'll see what I can do. :) invincible (talk) 03:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I live in Mulgrave, so I'll take a few shots of Waverly Gardens shopping centre and other bits as sugested. --Andrew Robbins (talk) 03:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mulgrave, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply