Talk:Mujhse Dosti Karoge!/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Nicholas Michael Halim in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Improve the non-free rationale for the poster with this template.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Other than that, the infobox looks great.
  • Add a comma after Rani Mukerji and "Pooja Sahani (Mukerji)".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Plot edit

  • "Pooja, Raj and Tina" → "Pooja, Raj, and Tina"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "attracted Tina" → "attracted to Tina"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "with via e-mail" → "with him via e-mail"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a comma after "her name".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "despite of being" → "despite being"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "realises" → "realizes"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "apologise" → "apologize"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Plot is under 700 words, so they're no problems with WP:FILMPLOT.

Cast edit

  • Instead of citing the same source for every character, might I suggest adding a simple "Credits adapted from Bollywood Hungama.[2]" to the top of the section?
  Not done Because there are source I cited from Rediff.com and Box Office India. The actor who plays young Tina does not mentioned on Bollywood Hungama, as well as Raja Vaid. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Production edit

  • "on 1996" → "on the 1996"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a comma after "Mukerji, Roshan".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "stars in the film, because" → "star in the film because"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "looks was the" → "looks were the"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The reference after "Yash Raj Films" doesn't say Aditya Chopra was a producer.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • In the second paragraph, can you explain when the actors were cast?
No sources or links mentioned that. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "more ... about" → "more [...] about"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Soundtrack edit

  • "described its soundtrack" → "described its soundtrack as"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "mixed response" → "mixed responses"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Release edit

  • Remove the comma after "across India".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "total grossing" → "total gross"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove the comma after "(US$4.7 million)".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "It was opened" → "It opened"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The last sentence should be moved to #Critical_reception, which should be retitled #Reception.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reception edit

  • Remove the comma after "of the leads".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "part as a" → "part as"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

References edit

  • Try archiving all sources (either manually or with this tool).

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·