Mudiraju not a Sindhi tribe edit

I have deleted the category Sindhi tribes, as the Mudiraju are clearly not a Sindhi tribe. Unless you can provide evidence to the contrary, please desist from putting in that category.

--WALTHAM2 (talk) 21:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Removal of poorly sourced content edit

@Balajirakonda: These sources are not acceptable:

  • M. M. Ninan: Self-published source
  • Mudiraj (book): It's from Alphascript publishing, which publishes Wikipedia articles; not acceptable per WP:CIRCULAR
  • mudiraja.com: Does not qualify as a reliable source by any standard -- it's a self-published source aimed at caste glorification, and is full of ridiculous pseudo-history
  • krishnaswamymudirajmemorialtrust.org: Again, a self-published source, aimed at glorifying a person (and not about the caste, anyway)

Please see WP:RS: Wikipedia articles should rely on scholarly, academic sources. utcursch | talk 05:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unacceptable source KNSR (talk) 06:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2021 edit

I have seen the article and it is edited by "Almighty34". It says "communities in the Andhra-Telangana region, community in recent years has been influenced by Hindutva ideology and have been more assertive against Dalits". This statement is super personal and cannot be generalized into one community or class. There hasn't been been one particular statement proving this in the recent history and it should be the subject of high risk for other users who read this article. Hence I request you to please check and possibly remove and report the established user who have edited this to his/her personal obligation. Thank you. Vishalsanga99 (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

have seen the article and it is edited by "Almighty34". It says "communities in the Andhra-Telangana region, community in recent years has been influenced by Hindutva ideology and have been more assertive against Dalits". This statement is super personal and cannot be generalized into one community or class. There hasn't been been one particular statement proving this in the recent history and it should be the subject of high risk for other users who read this article. Hence I request you to please check and possibly remove and report the established user who have edited this to his/her personal obligation. Thank you.  Vishalsanga99 (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Also, this user doesn't seem to have made the changes you have suggested. —Belwine (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2024 edit

183.83.234.145 (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Its not obc it's fc

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 20:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply