Talk:Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I must say, I'm overall pretty impressed by this article. I'll be back with more later. Cheers. I'^mperator 15:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC) OK, I've just finished going through the entire article, and, to be honest, can't really find any real mistakes, so I'm passing the article now.

A good article is:

1. Well-written: Nice Prose and WP:MOS
2. Factually accurate and verifiable: No original research, just about everything important is verified by accurate sources.
3. Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects.
4. Neutral: Yes.
5. Stable: Yes.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

Nicely done! Cheers. I'^mperator 15:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)