Talk:Mount Roraima

Latest comment: 1 year ago by RobotBoy66 in topic "Privileged setting"?

Height edit

I have found numerous different figures for the height of this mountain. What is the truth?--Filll 21:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article on Auyantepui states that is is "almost 3000m high", which contradicts the statement in this article that Roraima "the highest point for distance of 549.44 kilometres (341.48 miles) in any direction". Many sources give the maximum altitude of Roraima as 2810m.Cerambyx (talk) 09:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Waterfalls edit

Should not the Roraima water falls be mentioned? [1]--Filll 21:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cave edit

A Czech and Slovak team explored the Crystal Eyes Cave on Mount Roraima: [2].--Filll 21:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Information about Roraima from Pemon edit

[3]--Filll 22:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

History edit

[4]--Filll 22:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Formation edit

Would any specialists on the topic care to explain how a mountain like this is formed?

It was formed by erosion from an uplifted plateau, namely the Guiana Highlands. --Bejnar (talk) 00:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Name in English edit

  • A simple check of English sources shows that Mount Roraima is more commonly used. Take a look at Google Books just for an example. "Monte Roraima" is used primarily in non-English books. --Bejnar (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • I concur; the name in English is definitely Mount Roraima. In particular, British Colonial and Guyanese (i.e. English-language) sources support this convention. I'm making the move, per WP:MOSNAME. TheFeds 20:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Move? edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved to Mount RoraimaJuliancolton | Talk 01:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Monte RoraimaMount Roraima — Move needs to be completed by an administrator because there's a leftover edit history at Mount Roraima from years ago (so I can't move over the redirect).

  • Given that past moves went back and forth, I'll treat this as a controversial move (for the purposes of WP:RM), but I think WP:MOSNAME is clear—the English-language name takes precedence. Examples of this name in current use include the CIA, National Geographic, WWF an independent travel guide. In past use, "Mount Roraima" was used (for example) in British Guiana annual reports and the book British Guiana by Swan (ref. in article). TheFeds 21:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • The "leftover edit history" is a parallel version that was text-merged, not a cut-and-paste move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • a move to Mount Roraima certainyl does seem to be suported by WP:MOSNAME.
    V = I * R (talk) 05:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Also the literature on the Venezuelan border conflict, and its reflections, such as The Lost World. There is no reason to use Monte here, and it is contrary to English idiom (for all South American peaks, including those on which there is no territorial conflict). If Roraima were unambiguous, we could use that; but it isn't. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Support move, as above. --Bejnar (talk) 20:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

IPA pronunciation edit

The "Portuguese" pronunciation given is Brazilian Portuguese. This should be specified.

Not even Brazilian Portuguese, the first "a" is definitely not nasalized.150.165.134.250 (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Venezuela? edit

The article says that the Mountain is shared by Brazil, Guyana and Venezuela, but the map shows it entirely in Venezuela. Which is it? It can't be both.--dunnhaupt (talk) 20:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


Psaltisuk (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Roraima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Privileged setting"? edit

The final sentence in the lede states "The privileged setting and relatively easy access and climbing conditions on the south side of the cliffs make Mount Roraima one of the most popular destinations for hikers." (emphasis added) Can anyone explain what "privileged" means in this context? Bricology (talk) 02:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I had the same thought. Also 'most popular destinations for hikers.' Most popular in Venezuela, South America, the world? I went to the footnote link, Britannica, and found nothing on hikers. RobotBoy66 (talk) 09:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
The entire article needs a heavy copyedit as grammatical and syntactical errors abound. Parts of it may be the outcome of Google Translator. RobotBoy66 (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply