Talk:Mount Mazama/Archive 1

Archive 1

Intro

On the Cascade volcanoes page it says "42 times larger than the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens." However, on the Mount Mazama page it says "The eruption, estimated to have been 420 times more powerful than Mount St. Helens' 1980 blast". Which is correct? Jlea9378 (talk) 20:23, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I edited both articles and removed the unsupported statements.  –droll [chat] 17:04, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

GA possibility

This article is on WP:ORE's to-do list as an article that may be ready for a good article nomination. Does anyone know what might need to be done to get it ready? Thanks. Jsayre64 (talk) 22:52, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I take that back. I see the article has some issues. Jsayre64 (talk) 03:21, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

diagrams

shouldn't those diagrams have some sort of captions? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mount Mazama/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 08:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

• Should you expand "Giiwas in Klamath" to "Known as Giiwas in the Native American language Klamath" or something similar? I'm thinking the current explanation is too vague as Klamath is not a commonly known language.
• I'd definitely tone down the amount of wikilinks in the third and fourth paragraphs of the 'Ecology' section. I'd get rid of the wikilinks for broad types of animals, so unlink shrews but keep marsh shrews etc.
• I'd clarify to the reader what ' antimycin A' is, and possible the effect it has in this context.
• Is there an appropriate wikilink to link 'hydrothermal' to?
• Fault (geology)#Dip-slip faults is linked twice, once piped to 'normal' and once piped to 'normal faults'
• Pyroclastic rock and tholeiite are wikilinked, but not at their first mentions
• Same issue with lava fields and Dike (geology)

Looks great. Very thorough; I'd nominate this one for FAC asap if I were you. Will pass as soon as minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

@Freikorp: These should all be fixed. Thanks for your thorough review! ceranthor

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.