Talk:Motorways of Switzerland

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the European Highways Task Force.

Switzerland High‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems with this article edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Firstly, let me say that as far as basic information is concerned, this article is OK. It outlines what the Swiss motorways are for, where they are and when the current ones were built, as well as giving an overview of how they are funded. That's the good part.

The bad parts:
1. No references. The only thing close to a reference is the link to autobahnen.ch, which is no good for verifying individual statements. Something a bit more targeted is required, like an inline link to a page that supports a specific statement.
2. Possible original research - especially in the section marked "Construction". Let me explain...

It may be the experience of one or more editors that it is impractical to navigate using the motorway numbers - but in order to state that here on WP we really should find an independent source that also gives this opinion. Something like the British RAC / AA, Germany's ADAC or another motoring club might be a good place to look. The same applies to the statement about the design of signs - maybe a link to the design specifications for the signs would help?
The final comment in this section I understand, although the wording is not ideal. The problem is that such a sweeping generalization can't be made without some evidence to back it up. It's not enough to say "Of all the motorways I've driven on, the Swiss ones seem to have the most closely-spaced junctions." As I stated in my edit summary when I tagged this sentence, in order to reach that sort of conclusion we need to see some sort of comparison of the distance between junctions on Swiss motorways (both rural and urban) and other European countries' (again, both rural and urban). If the average distance is genuinely low for Switzerland in either category, it would be clear from such a comparison.

I apologise if this looks like I'm having a go at your hard work - I'm not, there's some good stuff here. The problem is that as someone who knows virtually nothing about Swiss motorways I have no idea whether what's here is accurate, made up or biased. (I've always used the N-roads to avoid shelling out on a vignette) --Peeky44 _{What's on your mind?} 21:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Peeky, but I'd go further: I don't think it's true that it's impractical to navigate using route numbers or that signs privilege control city names over route numbers. Route numbers are always posted at the top of Swiss motorway gantries, with control cities underneath; in this, Switzerland follows fairly standard European conventions. The only confusion arises because Swiss routes are often multiplexed (multiple routes running over the same stretch of road), so there are often multiple route numbers posted; this is compounded by the fact that many stretches also carry E-numbered European routes. However, this absolutely does not make it 'impractical' to navigate using route numbers. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.186.37.191 (talk) 09:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Motorways of Switzerland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic