![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Motion sickness.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Motion sickness article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Seasickness page were merged into Motion sickness on 7 February 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Ginger to treat motion sickness
editThe article states that Ginger "is ineffective in treating motion sickness." But there are plenty of sources that say otherwise. I'm sure somebody will object, calling it a folk remedy or alternative medicine, but the evidence is very strong. Fnordware (talk) 19:35, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
If you can find legitimate, reputable, sourced information (and if “the evidence is very strong” then surely you can), then please add it with references. PacificBoy 08:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- I definitely agree as the section seemed heavily biased towards medical treatments so I've reworded the Alternative medicine section to just state that the effectiveness of Ginger and Acupuncture against motion sickness are variable (as that term indicates it can either work or not work) and I've added two sources to support that they can be effective ( at least in some cases). Broman178 (talk) 10:22, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- @PacificBoy: The current "alternative medicine" section uses a combination of primary and secondary sources to imply that there is "debate" about the efficacy of ginger for treating air sickness. This is a primary source. WP:RS says not to do this. Also, I don't think New York Times is a really reliable source, per WP:MEDRS. - - Hunan201p (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- ... also, the University of Michigan link is about morning sickness. - Hunan201p (talk) 14:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- @PacificBoy: The current "alternative medicine" section uses a combination of primary and secondary sources to imply that there is "debate" about the efficacy of ginger for treating air sickness. This is a primary source. WP:RS says not to do this. Also, I don't think New York Times is a really reliable source, per WP:MEDRS. - - Hunan201p (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Fhh
editTyyehhe 118.179.22.14 (talk) 09:10, 1 July 2022 (UTC)