Untitled edit

Because of the issue stated by Andyluu0127 I've updated the article page with your draft. However I have saved the source code that was here, if you'd like to take a look at it click here. JasperIshi (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kdlee2, Krmuir3, SL98, Clmn3. Peer reviewers: JasperIshi, Andyluu0127, Joshuahi, Keleka11.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review edit

The research your group has done vastly expanded the information available on this topic, well done! Although I feel certain pre-existing information that had been there could be updated, specifically the census on Native Speakers. Also while reading the introduction and then the Classification the information seems so closely related maybe they could be incorporated with one another? JasperIshi (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  1. Very minor but move your work onto the actual page instead of the talk.
  2. I really appreciate the use of your citations. It makes your article more credible.
  3. Make sure to expand in the vocabulary section and any other sections that you guys are currently working on. Examples if any would be very helpful.

Andyluu0127 (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)AndyLuu0127Reply

I think if you added a map to the geographic distribution section it would be a good addition to the wiki article. That way the readers can get a better understanding of where the language is located. I think you have good start on the topics of the article so far. Keep adding to the areas of grammar and syntax as you continue with the project, good job! Joshuahi (talk) 09:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The charts and translations were very helpful in understanding the grammar of the language. More could be added to the history and intro paragraphs. Maybe move the sentences with the percentages in the intro paragraph somewhere else because it is not very interesting and will not draw in the reader. Other than that, good job. Keleka11 (talk) 08:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review Reply edit

Thank you guys for your suggestions, we have tried to follow them as best as we could! Also thank you Jasper for saving our previous source code, that was extremely thoughtful and helpful. I hope each of your projects have also been successfully completed! Kdlee2 (talk) 09:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Missing reference edit

@Kdlee2, Krmuir3, SL98, and JasperIshi:: I am happy to see this expanded article. However you have left out one of the major references. See the reference list at the end of the page where a large red error message says "Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." While you use this reference several times by name, you have not filled in a full reference. Please provide this. Thanks. StarryGrandma (talk) 06:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Someone unhelpfully just removed the references. I've put them back and fixed it. With my limited view into Ethnologue it turns out that was the needed reference. StarryGrandma (talk) 21:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply