Talk:Mormon Battalion

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Members of the Mormon Battalion

edit

This article should include names of members of the Mormon Battalion. For example: Abraham Day, Arza Erastus Hinckley

Seeing that there was over 500 members of the Mormon Battalion, i would make a mess out of the article. The captains of each company should be named, but probably little more. BraveFoot (talk) 02:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
The MBA should soon have an indexed roster of all members on its web site - perhaps that is sufficient?Blbachman (talk) 15:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Fleek mentions that there were two young men (from England IIRC) non-LDS who joined. I'll have to look for the citation.Blbachman (talk) 15:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article Organization

edit

While sequential, the structure and information provided in the article skirts the areas of greatest importance, including the overall impact of the march to California on the War and the lasting impact of the Battalion on Mormon western expansion. Plus, it appears to lean to the POV of the US military rather than the recuited Saints. Objections to restructuring?? Suggestions?? WBardwin 06:36, 3 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The structure is such because it is a cut and paste of a POV article from who knows where. I broke it into sections as a meager step toward wikification, but in reality gutting and rewriting is probably better for the articles long-term health. Interesting topic that few know much about. I'm willing to contribute writing and research, if you want to go after a chunk at a time... Dr U 00:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

POV/perhaps copyvio article appears 17:53, 14 June 2005 66.238.118.146 (k duryee article). Manipulation since then probably removes it from any copyvio status, but the article is a real mess.
Most of my sources are LDS POV, but some of them are well researched and annotated. Journal material from the soldiers (and some of their wives) is readily available, but what information I have from the army's perspective shows little respect for the Mormon recruits, probably because few of them were ever interested in becoming soldiers in the first place. When you are "called" to volunteer, your attitude, perception of your role and your respect for your officers is different than the average US army soldier of the time. Plus, representatives from the LDS leadership arrived in camp at intervals, and seemed to pull the soldiers in two directions. Authority and heirarchy was difficult on both sides.
Should we come up with a new outline? WBardwin 05:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
New outline is a good idea. We can then extract many facts from the article in its current form, and plug them into the new outline. After that, trash the current version, and post our working outline as the new article, and go from there, only adding properly referenced material. I'm game.

Dr U 05:40, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The outline is a good start, at least. I'll go through my books and try to organize some material. Some good stuff appears to be online as well. Wikipedia doesn't yet have an article on Col. Thomas L. Kane -- who was slightly involved in the Battalion. I have some Mormon information on him but he had a Civil War Career as well. Always something else to create. WBardwin 08:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

==Outline== ===Introduction=== ===Battalion's origins=== ====Army's reasons for creating battalion==== ====Mormon's reasons for cooperating==== ===Muster=== ====How the Mormons were organized==== ====Who/How of Army's choice for officers==== ===The March=== ====Place they went one==== =====things they did there===== ====Place they went 23==== =====things they did there===== ===Arrival in California=== ===Post arrival duties/reenlistees=== ===Aftermath=== ====Effects on the Mormon Church==== ====Effects on the U.S. Army==== ====Effects on California==== ====Effects on individual participants==== ===Legacy today=== ===External links=== ===Works cited=== Feel free to gut the above if your writing ability outshines mine, which isn't unlikely.

Dr U 05:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

unexplained deletion

edit

This text was just deleted:

Military Accolades
Colonel Cooke honored the Mormon Battalion when he declared, "History may be searched in vain for an equal march of infantry. Half of it has been through a wilderness where nothing but savages and wild beasts are found, or deserts where, for want of water, there is no living creature. There, with almost hopeless labor we have dug deep wells, which the future traveler will enjoy. Without a guide who had traversed them, we have ventured into trackless table-lands where water was not found for several marches. With crowbar and pick and axe in hand, we have worked our way over mountains, which seemed to defy aught but the wild goat, and hewed a passage through a chasm of living rock more narrow than our wagons... Thus, marching half naked and half fed, and living upon wild animals, we have discovered and made a road of great value to our country."

Probably because it needs a reference - thought I would preserve it here. --Trödel 20:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

If one does a quick search of "History may be searched in vain for an equal march of infantry" on google, or on google books, many sources can be found for various part of the quote, including:
  • Philip St. George Cooke, "Cooke's Journal of the March of the Mormon Battalion, 1846–1847," in Ralph P. Bieber, ed., Exploring Southwestern Trails, 1846–1854 (1939), 239–40. As quoted at http://www.lds.org/gospellibrary/pioneer/12_Council_Bluffs.html
  • Roberts, Brigham Henry (1919) The Mormon Battalion: its history and achievements, Deseret News, p. 52
  • McClintock, James H. (1921) Mormon Settlement in Arizona, p. 15
  • Utah State History (a division of Utah Department of Community and Culture), Markers and Monuments Database, Mormon Battalion Monument (2) Markers
  • Bigler, David L. and Bagley, Will, ed. (2000) Army of Israel: Mormon Battalion Narratives, University of Utah Press, ISBN 978-0-87062-297-7
Needless to say, it is a valid quote. -- 71.223.117.243 (talk) 05:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

re: unexplained deletion

edit

According to several online sources the citation is: Philip St. George Cooke, "Cooke's Journal of the March of the Mormon Battalion, 1846–1847," in Ralph P. Bieber, ed., Exploring Southwestern Trails, 1846–1854 (1939), 239–40 I don't have direct access to the Bieber book (obviously out of print) or to Cooke's Journal - does it need further checking? Blbachman 21:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

removed cleanup tag

edit

I took off the tag because the article seems to have improved a lot since it was put on. The only real serious thing is that the introduction is really long, and this should be fixed. Wrad 07:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have deleted the following sentence in from this article in this edit: "This remains as the longest single military march in U.S. history." This is simple incorrect, and is an item of Mormon folklore/Mormon urban myth this was recently readdressed by the LDS Church Historical Department in Legacy: Episode 39: Mormon Myths on the Mormon Channel. Please do not add this popular but incorrect notion back to the article. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Mormon Battalion Ed Fraughton.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Mormon Battalion Ed Fraughton.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Missing information

edit

The article says, "President Polk agreed to Little's offer if...", but there is no mention of any offer before this. Rsduhamel (talk) 03:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photo for needs citation

edit

I have taken two photos of the Monument outside Santa Fe, which the article says needs citation (of what's written on the plaque). Since I have a photo of the plaque, it should serve as citation. How do I add a photo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pictom (talkcontribs) 18:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please see c:Commons:Welcome, c:Commons:First steps, c:Commons:FAQ, wp:Wikimedia Commons, and wp:Images. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


THANKS but too complicated. I added the photo. If anyone can figure out how to add this to serve as a citation,go ahead.

File:Mormon Battalion Monument Santa Fe NM.JPG
File:Mormon Battalion Monument Santa Fe, NM.JPG

I also have a file of the entire monument, which I'll try to add now.

I'm confused by the selection stating I have the copyright (or something). I took the photo but I did not create the monument. (This file is my own work.) If it was asking me if I created the monument... well, just delete the whole thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pictom (talkcontribs) 19:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your photos are very welcome, and thank you for adding them to Commons so they could be used in this article; however the photo's are not themselves citable. Please see the sources added just now for examples of that are actual usable sources. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mormon Battalion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mormon Battalion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply