Talk:Moral treatment

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Medicine: Psychiatry Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Nursing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nursing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nursing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NursingWikipedia:WikiProject NursingTemplate:WikiProject NursingNursing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Language edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could I query a couple of the terms used, for example, mental defectives and clients in the following sentence? By the mid-19th century in England, the Alleged Lunatics' Friend Society was proclaiming that the new moral treatment was just a new form of repression achieved by mildness, coaxing and solitary confinement; that its emphasis on re-education meant it treated people like children or mental defectives; and that it failed to properly involve clients in decisions about their care. Did ALFS actually use those terms? If not, are they the best translation of what they did use?81.102.15.200 (talk) 12:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I think both terms could be altered. It's the author in the cited article that's discussing their views and only rarely quoting unfortunately. The former term might be better represented as "incapable" and the latter I guess just "patients" although I understood the point of at least some asylums, including the Retreat, was that they weren't hospitals as such. Btw in the other bit in the article, "meek existence" was meant to stand for what they are quoted as saying - "milk sop existence" - but didn't seem clear what the latter meant (but maybe should add the quote too). EverSince (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge wikipedia histories edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I propose someone reads the following articles, which all contain duplicate content, and include information relevant in each of them:

In particular, I think the following figures are mentioned in some, and not others, and should be considered for mention in each:

Sondra.kinsey (talk) 22:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moral treatment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828194332/http://www.psychminded.co.uk/news/news2008/march08/Making_recovery_a_reality_policy_paper.pdf to http://www.psychminded.co.uk/news/news2008/march08/Making_recovery_a_reality_policy_paper.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic