Talk:Moral blindness/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Rianahen in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 15:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Basic stuff and comments edit

  • "after events" → "after the events"
  • "wide ranging" → "wide-ranging"
  • Add a serial comma after "ethical fading" in the lead.
  • Milgram and Zimbardo → Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo
  • "for deportation" → "for the deportation"
  • The last paragraph in #Overview needs a source.
  • Add serial commas after "judgements" and "Hume".
  • Evil [4]Evil[4]
  • "good"[12] → "good".[12]
  • 18th century [9][10][11] → 18th century[9][10][11]
  • trolley problem. [13] → trolley problem.[13]
  • The last two sentences from #In_psychology need sources.
  • "research focus" → "research focused"
  • "developed upon to" → "developed to"
  • "ZImbardo" → "Zimbardo"
  • nature"” → nature"
  • Add serial commas after "individual, situational", "politics", and "business ethics".
  • Add columns to the #See_also section.
  • With all that in mind, references are in good shape.

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thank you so much for your review of the page. I really appreciate the feedback and comments. I've made changes to the page in response to them so do let me know if anything looks amiss and if I need to make any other changes. Again, thank you for the time you put into this! Rianahen (talk) 23:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Buidhe: Sorry about that! I've been away for a bit but will be on top of the page from now on. Rianahen (talk) 23:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • @Rianahen: Looks great!   Only things needed before I pass are removing the space between #See also and #References and fixing the link in the lead of [[Philip Zimbardo|Philip Zimbardo)]] to [[Philip Zimbardo]] (with the ")" outside as well). Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Yeay! Noted and done! Thank you! Rianahen (talk) 23:42, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply