Talk:Mont-Bellevue, Quebec

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

District or park, or both? edit

The corresponding French articles put emphasis on Mont-Bellevue as a park rather than a borough. I believe the English page should follow suit. --SweetNightmares (talk) 16:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have decided to change the article to reflect this. Does anyone still believe it to be a stub? --SweetNightmares (awaken) 18:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
The park should have an article, certainly, but that should be separate from an article on the borough rather than a replacement for an article on the borough, because they're not the same thing and there's no good reason why Mont-Bellevue should be the only borough of Sherbrooke that doesn't have its own article. I've moved your content to a new title, Mont-Bellevue Park, because the park and the borough should be dealt with separately — and according to Wikipedia's naming conventions, the title with comma-Quebec in it has to be the borough, because that's the disambiguation standard for populated places, not for geographic features. If disambiguation was needed, the park would have to be dabbed with "(Quebec)" (i.e. parentheses) rather than comma-Quebec. Bearcat (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mont-Bellevue, Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply