Talk:Monstera minima

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Remove this page. It is a duplicate for the correct classification of Rhaphidophora tetrasperma edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhaphidophora_tetrasperma 213.237.90.179 (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

It is not. It is a real and approved species. It has nothing to do with Rhaphidophora Tetrasperma, although its common name is unfortunately the same.

[1]https://www.gbif.org/species/2868240

[2]https://wfoplantlist.org/plant-list/taxon/wfo-0000245786-2022-12?page=1

[3]https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:163942-2 Jvsiu (talk) 18:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I would propose revisions to both pages referencing cross-confusion and distinct features between each plant if Monstera minima is, in fact, a real and distinct plant from the false mini monstera. An image of a real Monstera minima would also be helpful in clearing confusion. 2607:FB91:EC8:8CA8:AC39:BD72:8425:CE62 (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic