Talk:Monoid (category theory)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by D.Lazard in topic 1 in diagrams is not defined
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Monoid (category theory) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
History monoid edit
From what I'm reading, the history monoid is the categorical product in the category of monoids. Although I want to put this notation into this article, I'm somewhat nervous doing so, as the statement is coming from a computer science book rather than a category theory book. I have not yet personally verified that it really does satisfy all the needed morphism properties; maybe after lunch .... linas 17:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
1 in diagrams is not defined edit
1 is used in diagrams but is not defined nor even mentioned in the text. WillNess (talk)
