Talk:Monocrotophos

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 173.166.61.113 in topic Technical language

Technical language edit

Apologies if as a guest I'm posting in error, but I found the highly technical language in this article cumbersome. Would a contributor who's familiar with the subject be willing to rewrite? --173.166.61.113 (talk) 13:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Structural formula edit

I made a new drawing of the 2D-molecular structure today, because the old one wasn't correct; see discussion there.--Spiperon (talk) 04:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Conclusions edit

This article has a "conclusion" section. Wikipedia articles generally do not have conclusions as they tend to violate WP:NPOV. Wapondaponda (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

This was because the text had been copied directly from a pesticide advice factsheet. Keri (talk) 10:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

References edit

The information in the artcle appears well-researched, but very little of it is to be found in the 3 references listed, with # 3 containing news not (yet) in the artcle. Are there references awaiting entry or something? Thanks! Janice Byer, Delaware, USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janbyer (talkcontribs) 02:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

The references for the text were included on the original website from which the text was directly copied. The original plagiarist was too lazy to copy them over, however. On the plus side, this did help determine which came first: the WP page or the external website! Keri (talk) 11:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio edit

The majority of the article was made up of text copied directly from this website by User:172.188.56.157 in 2007. It has been removed. Keri (talk) 10:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply