Talk:Monita Secreta
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Heavenlyblue in topic some see it as an essentially accurate portrait by a former Jesuit
Tried to clean up the style of this page, although it needs more work in the later sections. I also attempted to make it clear that - based on the scholarly consensus of all cited sources, especially Pavone - the document is regarded as false.
some see it as an essentially accurate portrait by a former Jesuit edit
"Scholars regard the document as an anti-Jesuit forgery." Would it not be more honest to say "Most scholars regard the document as an anti-Jesuit forgery, though some see it as an essentially accurate portrait by a former Jesuit."? Heavenlyblue (talk) 00:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)