This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think it should be considered that this article is more about the hoax of the fossil being a spider, rather than being tentative about it's validity. Source 1 is confident in the fossil being painted on, and the further study is to distinguish what kind of crawfish the fossil is and not the validity of the spider. I think this article should reflect that better, instead of being formatted as actual science this article should be labled hoax and link to what they think the crawfish might be. ActuallyAsterisk42 (talk) 20:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
