Talk:Monetary/fiscal debate

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 April 2018 by reviewer Aunva6 (talk · contribs).

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citations edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Greetings, Aunva6. The method of citation followed in this article is (a) citing the source per standard reference nomenclature for books and articles, e.g. Gnome (2018), which is done in "Notes," and then (b) listing the full style of referenced books and articles, which is done in "Bibliography." Do you want to change this to citing directly the books in "Bibliography"? It can be easily done, yet I find the current display way more convenient for the users who get a full and uncluttered list of publications in "Bibliography," and the footnotes separately. It's one of the two ways citations are offered in papers and books, as you probably know. -The Gnome (talk) 07:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have no problem with the presence of the bibliography, it's not common, but it works fine. my only gripe is that you didn't use the citation templates to do so. however, on rereading the guidelines, it appears that their use is entirely optional. so, i am just waiting on check of the sources from JSTOR. i can't access them myself, so I requested another editor to do so. if it's not done yet today, ill probably go ahead and push it through regardless. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 13:13, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic