Talk:Monarchy of Finland

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles

Finland

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion

This article should be edited to meet with Wikipedia's formatting standards. It should be in paragraph form. Also, instead of saying "See ___," make a "See also" section. -PhattyFatt 00:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Did that now. --Drieakko 04:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Drieakko, why did You undo the changes? Because You don't have a clue about the Finnish history so please stop harassing the works of others. Do You like having all your contributions removed instantly without discussion? Who the f*ck You think You are, the only person with permission to edit Wikipedia??

First, there are several records of ancient Finnish monarchs. The beginning of the chapter "Early developments" was a lie contrary to well known facts (from all over Europe) and even other Wikipedia articles. Notice I didn't say accurate records.

Second, there's nothing 'nominal' with the Charles IX's title. He was a king and ruled also Finns. So what 'nominal' there is in the title? It didn't say Finnish king. Wikipedia articles should be accurate without biased unhistorical 'facts'. Please help to attain that instead of automatically reverting everything to the old unaccurate versions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.248.154.130 (talk) 16:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Anonymous user, kindly note WP:NPA. Please give references what are the "several records of ancient Finnish monarchs". A title is nominal if it has no administrative concept behind it. There was no specific administrative arrangement whatsoever for Finns who were fully governed under the King of Sweden. Thus "King of Finns" was only a nominal addition. --Drieakko 17:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

After not receiving any comments or references, I removed the claim about records of ancient Finnish kings. Also reworded the note about Charles IX's title to be more generally understandable. --Drieakko 12:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

THERE IS NO SUCH A THING AS THE KINGDOM OF FINLAND! COME ON! DON'T PUT ON THE WORLD WAR ONE ALLIES THING THAT IT WAS KINGDOM OF INLAND! OKAY? GOOD! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.163.16.203 (talk) 08:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC) LOL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.77.70.242 (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

There certainly was a Kingdom of Finland. Finland remained a monarchy until 1919. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.224.91.84 (talk) 07:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

However the Lapps or Sameh do not have royalty. Chiefs of their small clans, perhaps.119.224.91.84 (talk) 07:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The first sentence is very punny. Kudos to whoever wrote it. -HawkeyE (talk) 04:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic