Talk:Monarchomachs
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Defining the Monarchomachs
editHello. I am having trouble identifying the monarchomachs for this page. JWAllen (1928) lists Languet, Mornay, Buchanan and Boucher as the 'chiefs of the monarchomachi' (p331) so I was wondering on what grounds the others are included on this page. I don't think that William Barclay's original work is translated out of Latin so I can't go to that source to confirm things. Any thoughts?
Ccorton 13:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- They are several sources included in the article, for example here by Gallica and here. Authors such as François Hotman are widely recognized as famous Monarchomachs. Is there any of them which you suspect of not being a Monarchomach? Tazmaniacs 16:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- PS: I do not know Allen's work, but bear in mind that it is from 1928, not 2007. Tazmaniacs 16:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
"collective corpse"?
editDoes this make any sense at all?
- They considered that the people was a collective corpse, doted of a specific wisdom, which allowed him better than the king to understand the common good, discrete from the interest of each of its parties.
-- Calion | Talk 00:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
"collective body" might be better, no? Two main ideas: the people form a collective body which has more wisdom, collectively, than the king ; the common good is not equivalent to the simple sum of particular interests. Tazmaniacs 12:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Monarchomachs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070507125351/http://www.memo.fr/dossier.asp?ID=1011 to http://www.memo.fr/dossier.asp?ID=1011
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)