Talk:Mols Bjerge National Park

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Mols Bjerge National Park appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "more than half of all wild Danish plant species" exist at Mols Bjerge National Park?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mols Bjerge National Park.

Wikipedia

North, East or South...?

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I can see that the placement of MBNPark in the Jutlandic geography has been a cause of confusion. I want to set things straight. All three thing is (to some degree) true! ...but the most precise would be northern Jutland. Why and how can all three suggestions be true?

Why northern Jutland? from old days and generally speaking Jutland is on the gross scale divided into a northern part and a southern part, divided by the stream of Kongeåen. Look it up on wikipedia to read the details. In modern times several subdivisions has been introduced. for example northern Jutland is viewed as being divided into a northern Jutland and Middle Jutland (and one could throw in Himmerland between the two also) for political reasons, and according to this division MBNPark is in Middle Jutland (a fourth possibility!). Middle Jutland has previously been divided into an eastern and a western part and according to this somewhat outdated division, MBNPark is located in eastern Jutland. This subdivision has officially been abandoned as of 2007 on several levels. Last, the former region of Eastern Jutland were comprised by several subregions and the peninsula of Djursland was one of them. Djursland still exist as a political region though and is further subdivided into Northern Djursland and Southern Djursland. MBNPark is primarily located in Southern Djursland. So this explains why all three answers (to some degree) is true.

I hope this excursion cleared things up and explained why MBNPark is best described as being located in Northern Jutland? :-) (get a map and avoid a headache...)

RhinoMind (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mols Bjerge National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic