Talk:Molly Dawes/GA1
Latest comment: 27 days ago by OlifanofmrTennant in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: FishLoveHam (talk · contribs) 19:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 13:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC) This has been assigned to me from the GARC
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- So the lead paragraph uses series in refrences to "Our Girl series one". It once again used series in references to "Our Girl" this seems confusing. Consider altering wording
- The story line section seems a little; is there any way to slim that down?
- What? FishLoveHam (talk) 07:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- a little large* Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 14:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- "When he dies, the ASF become involved to track down Badrai." grammar
- Done I'm not sure what this is asking me to do, but I changed "to track" to "in tracking". FishLoveHam (talk) 07:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- IMO the reception over uses quotes
- Done Paraphrased some FishLoveHam (talk) 07:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- "His colleague, Thomas Ling" reword this, preferably mention he was also writing for radio times.
- "Pirbright, Surrey" both places are linked separately see MOS:GEOLINK
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Can use explain the use of Daily Mirror (WP:DAILYMIRROR), Metro WP:METRO, and Whats on TV?
- Done Removed usage of Mirror and Metro, from what I've seen, What's on TV is a reliable source for British entertainment-related news. It's the best-selling British entertainment magazine [1], Several Wikiprojects related to British television list it as a useful source of information. It was described fairly positively by Sainsbury's. FishLoveHam (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ref 15 is used twice next to itself. Remove the first use as there aren't any sources between the first and last.
- Can use explain the use of Daily Mirror (WP:DAILYMIRROR), Metro WP:METRO, and Whats on TV?
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Anything else negative? Maybe could be found in episode reviews
- Not done Not really no. Besides the pilot, the show only began receiving regular episode reviews after she left. All I could really find negative was ref 15. FishLoveHam (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Anything else negative? Maybe could be found in episode reviews
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images need both alt text and standered text. The infobox image needs both and the second image needs ALT text.
- Done alt texts, Not done standered text, what is that? FishLoveHam (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Images need both alt text and standered text. The infobox image needs both and the second image needs ALT text.
- The lead picture needs a caption like "x as they appeared in x" see: Felicity Smoak (Arrowverse) or Stephanie Edwards (Grey's Anatomy) Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 14:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @OlifanofmrTennant: I have to disagree. The character has only been portrayed by one actress, the image is cropped to the character's face. I don't see the need for clarification. Is it a requirement? Because there are plenty of similar character articles which achieved GA status without a caption. FishLoveHam (talk) 14:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
@FishLoveHam: all I found, when you're done send a ping Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @OlifanofmrTennant: Addressed everything. FishLoveHam (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: