 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dean Gallery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061105013441/http://www.nationalgalleries.org/collections/ to http://www.nationalgalleries.org/collections/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Undue Weight edit
The issue of "undue weight" to history largely stems from the renaming of the article... the bulk of interest in the property is within its earlier history... the rebranding in 2011 leaves it as a subservient addition to Modern One which totally underplays its role in Edinburgh history.--Stephencdickson (talk) 12:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- How can the history be correct when building started in 1831 but the railway company (North British Railway) was not formed and received its Act until 1844? 82.28.236.130 (talk) 22:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- How could Bonar contrive a plan in the 1830s with Lady Glenorchy when she died in 1786? How could the Hospital be built from 1831 when Learmonth was not brought in to the idea and gift the land until around 1833? There is no mention in the history of the Hospital published in 1833 that Bonar did anything, in particular it does not show him as providing any funds. The source, Grant's Old and New Edinburgh, provides no evidence for what is stated. It appears that the whole paragraph is pure invention and should be replaced.82.28.236.130 (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is editable - you can edit the article and add correct information yourself, as long as it is supported by reliable sources. The material you're criticising is unsourced and can legitimately be removed. Cnbrb (talk) 14:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- How could Bonar contrive a plan in the 1830s with Lady Glenorchy when she died in 1786? How could the Hospital be built from 1831 when Learmonth was not brought in to the idea and gift the land until around 1833? There is no mention in the history of the Hospital published in 1833 that Bonar did anything, in particular it does not show him as providing any funds. The source, Grant's Old and New Edinburgh, provides no evidence for what is stated. It appears that the whole paragraph is pure invention and should be replaced.82.28.236.130 (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)