 | A fact from Modern (Seattle building) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2020, and was viewed approximately 2,653 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the high-rise Third and Lenora building in Seattle lost its main tenant, WeWork, before it was completed? Source: Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce (paywalled)
- Reviewed: Sports manga
Created by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 07:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC).
Interesting "under construction", on good sources, subscription sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I am not yet happy with the hook. Do you intentionally don't mention where it is? How about the image, to show style, and - more important, that it is not yet finished. I think "was completed" is plain wrong, as it seems to suggest that it was. Or is that one of my language problems? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thanks for dropping by to review. I added the city, but I don't see anything wrong with "before it was completed", as it is an appropriate description of the situation. A quick Google search shows that it's used in an error message for Microsoft Outlook, for what that's worth. SounderBruce 20:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- I can just believe you, and if it's a problem, a prep builder can fix. What about the image? Otherwise, it could be any kind of building, no? People nor familiar withSeattle will not recognize the name as streets. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: I have added a QPQ. I don't think that the image of the building would produce well as a 100px thumbnail, but to help illustrate things I have added "high-rise" to the hook. Most Seattleites probably wouldn't be able to tell you about this building since it's new and not particularly distinct compared to the other stuff nearby. SounderBruce 21:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thank you, understand --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: I have added a QPQ. I don't think that the image of the building would produce well as a 100px thumbnail, but to help illustrate things I have added "high-rise" to the hook. Most Seattleites probably wouldn't be able to tell you about this building since it's new and not particularly distinct compared to the other stuff nearby. SounderBruce 21:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- I can just believe you, and if it's a problem, a prep builder can fix. What about the image? Otherwise, it could be any kind of building, no? People nor familiar withSeattle will not recognize the name as streets. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Thanks for dropping by to review. I added the city, but I don't see anything wrong with "before it was completed", as it is an appropriate description of the situation. A quick Google search shows that it's used in an error message for Microsoft Outlook, for what that's worth. SounderBruce 20:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
